The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. Another significant issue could be software compatibility. It was developed and is maintained by Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG. Not too old, and not too new. Discord is available in the Arch User Repositories as well. Arch more or less requires you to perform an update of all your stuff before you install a new package to ensure it all works well as a rolling binary distro. Arch Linux is one of the cutting-edge Linux distros that lets you thrive on customization and minimalism. It comes with three editions: desktop, core, and server. Can someone tell me what was this guy smoking in the past, oh idk, life? epel-release is the repository that contains Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux and will likely have what you can't find. After all, Ubuntu is the only one of these distributions with a proper installer. Manjaro is an open-source Linux distro based on Arch Linux. I believe that it played an important role in Ubuntu’s popularity because when Ubuntu was just created in 2004, installing Linux itself was considered a huge task.The Ubuntu installer allows you to install Ubuntu in around 10 minutes. Arch Linux (60 points) Ubuntu (40 points) Debian, Fedora, Linux Mint (20 points) Conclusion Ubuntu … I use ArchLinux too. Some of the names that you will never miss are; Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Debian, and Mint. System processes are not obfuscated behind a user interface. Ubuntu inherits Debian's Steam and has Discord available as a Snap, though a.debpackage is distributed which works with both it and Debian. TL;DR: It probably won't really help you, but if you want to change for ideological reasons, like I did, then go for it. Ubuntu’s Ubiquity installer is one of easiest installers out there. Arch Linux and its derivatives have a bad way of handling dependencies. Is Ubuntu starting to lose mind share? LoL on Ubuntu 13fps, on arch 44fps. I will save this just so I can play with it later on. In terms of finding what you need on CentOS you are missing: Log out and log back in. There are some arguments in favour of centralization though. The learning experience that comes with the previous two. Thanks for the heads up. Arch Linux is faster in gaming, cause it's clean => no underground rocks at installing dx11 wine patches etc. Arch as a policy keeps patching of upstream software to a minimum and only does it to avoid breakage. Package headers are also split into *-dev and symbols are in *-dbg. Arch is an additive distro, rather than removing what you don't need you add what you do to a minimal base. None of the things you have bulleted have been justified with examples. The downside is that they are not as featureful and have less options. The two main ones that stuck out to me was the quality of some packages in AUR. Couple of reasons why one might pick Ubuntu over Arch: Lack of KISS principle, Ubuntu's solutions tend to be more engineered and cover obscure use cases more having Debian as their parent and inhaeriting most of their system tools. That was exactly what I did. And they moving towards mesa for everything. Press J to jump to the feed. For the desktop I don't use Debian, because I don't really like the length of period that it takes to get a new release with updated packages. Arch, well, is installed by the Linux Master Race people and they love to flex their Linux knowledge. The same is true about Ubuntu. As for Manjaro, first released on July 10, 2011, it is derived from Arch Linux, a powerful distro that focuses on simplicity and customization. I have an RTX Nvidia graphics card which doesn't play nicely with X-Server, let alone Wayland. Repositories. I do however use it for virtual machines on my server. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS … Couple of reasons why one might choose Arch over Ubuntu: KISS principle. It's like the actual repository that pacman uses, but anyone can upload to it, so you end up with a ton of very useful packages that you would have to build if it didn't exist -- always a plus for me. The things that have me interested in swapping are: Rolling release so no reinstall necessary until I inevitably break something beyond my googling skills. And which Linux distro is gaining popularity due to Ubuntu's waning momentum? The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. To confirm that the tool is installed, just issue the command ifconfig on the terminal. You can click your way through with full guidance at ever… Most Linux software developers provide their apps in both .deb and .rpm file formats.. Instead, it is built on the continually cutting edge Arch Linux. Rolling release, this is different from bleeding edge, but Arch has no "versions", only the software in the repos. All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. You can always custom compile the latest and greatest updates on your own with Ubuntu though. ‘’The Arch wiki’’ refers to a widespread body of information comprising documents for essentially any assignment you wish to do in ‘’Arch Linux’’ and also in other derivatives. Lack of bloatware - arch gives you the literal minimum you need and you decide what you want to add to that. Ubuntu is an open-source Linux distribution based on Debian. ... Arch uses a rolling release model for updates. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Ubuntu's policy is to patch upstream software to improve it. Penguins, enough said. AUR means you need a build system around. ... for ex. The downside is that you have to know what you need. Lost its way. Some people pointed out that updating Arch is a high risk affair. Both Arch and Ubuntu are Linux systems, but given that Ubuntu has more mainstream appeal, you might find that there’s a lot more official support for it in terms of third-party software. Print. Ubuntu is another majorly famous distro, itself being based on Debian but with a few nice additions under the hood like the ability to use PPAs and it’s LTS releases. Unlike, for example Ubuntu where a new version is released every six months, packages are updated when they are ready. Since the main advantage you listed was speed, it's worth noting that a well-configured arch will be quicker than default Ubuntu. Manjaro made its debut in 2011. They are benefits to using Arch but it's not going to make you a better programmer. reddit, Instacart, and Asanaare some of the popular companies that use Ubuntu, whereas Arch Linux is used by Decision6, IT-Partner-Berlin, and store2be GmbH. Ubuntu (100 points) Arch Linux (70 points) Debian (40 points) Reddit Surveys. This means Pacman resolves dependencies slightly quicker than dpkg because the dependency system is not as complicated, conversely dpkg can handle more complex dependency logic than pacman which you almost never need. Variety: Tons of variants of Linux to choose from with different experiences, such as Debian, Ubuntu, Solus, Mint, Deepin, and Arch (There are honestly way too many to name them all) Free and open source, anyone can take a look at the code behind it and make sure its doing what its supposed to. When comparing Arch Linux vs Linux Lite, ... More like for posting screenshots on Reddit. Arch Linux is ranked 4th while Fedora is ranked 12th. Bear in mind that Arch has no graphicall installer and you have to set up your system enirely with command line. The downside is arch requires more maintenance because it's a rolling release and getting your system up and running will take work/time because it's not meant as an install-and-go distro. I have been using Ubuntu for a while now(about 3 months in a VM) and I use it regularly to learn C. I tried using CentOS, but the software that normally Ubuntu has it's just not there. Ubuntu mostly just throws everything you could possibly need to make sure you have what you need. To learn C you should obviously use TempleOS. PPA's are not centralized, anyone can host their own. Arch being a rolling release binary distro is also more or less requiring users to always update their system at once rather than in parts to ensure it keeps working. No, any distro is fine for learning programming, and unix commands. However, due to Ubuntu’s massive popularity and larger userbase, some software vendors only provide DEB packages or choose to release their apps in .deb format first. I'm still using ubuntu, but I'm planning on giving the arch install a shot tomorrow since I'm off. Personally for desktop I only consider rolling release distros (mostly Arch and derivatives), but would never use one on a server (usually just pure Debian). Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. Because it is not full of Canonical bullshit. Arch likes to keep things as simple as possible, you can like it or not but that's what they do, tools that are not "overengineered" are often easier to understand and work faster and have less bugs. I've seen the memes and semi-reluctanlty jumped after my 3rd attempt of Ubuntu 20.20 failed (it needed the latest kernel apparently for my new GPU). In practise this allows you to get the system you want more quickly I find. "apt-get autoremove" has never failed me yet, while "pacman -Qdtq | pacman -Rs" seems to be a lot more of a dirty hack to remove unused dependencies, and certainly not "KISS". For example, Ubuntu and Linux Mint will favor beginners while Kali Linux and Arch Linux would be good choices for advanced users. Also, no built-in AUR interface, in which you need pacaur to have a sane way of using said repository. Since they are each just dpkg repos unlike AUR which hosts build scripts they are indistinguishable from other repos in the end. On the other hand, Cinnamon DE can also be installed and used on Ubuntu, Debian, OpenSUSE, Arch Linux, and Fedora distributions. ... A subreddit for Linux enthusiasts. Furthermore this distro would allow you to praise god. Making system updates (like it was with 10.04 to 11.04) that screw so many things up became a routine. I'm still a linux noob, but I'm interested in becoming a competent "power user" rather than just a user and forcing it on myself seems like the best way. They have started doing that as of 3 years ago, and that's about the time I revisited ArchLinux. Based on the user experience and behavior, the battle of Cinnamon Vs GNOME is always a hot topic in the Linux community. The other positive feature of debian/ubuntu is the future possibility of reproducible builds which will be impossible in ArchLinux. In the last ~ 18 months I've been running Arch, it has automatically updated the proprietary nvidia driver and kernel several times without ever skipping a beat. But it should not be used by more advanced users since the method of installing through the terminal is much faster and easier after one is used to it. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Arch is an additive distro, rather than removing what you don't need you add what you do to a minimal base. if you want software that was updated yesterday, and are super bleeding edge, than Ubuntu isn't for you. In particular placing of third party binary applications in any place other than /opt is inappropriate. A versioned release cycle, this places certain guarantees that all packages within one version work well together. [...] but besides what I need I like to use open source software. Moreover, a terminal is an alternative interface besides the desktop interface and offers advanced control on the Linux OS. If you don't have time to learn installing arch, try Manjaro or Antergos. Having a lean system with just what I want on it. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the linuxmasterrace community, A subreddit for Linux enthusiasts. Arch is a great distro, but unfortunately, if you want to install it you have to do a lot of work. This guarantees that the system at least boots and more or less works before you start cutting into the fat. Hardened Gentoo would probably be my choice for that as it implements SELinux already. It sounds like not much. If you are one of those people who just wants to use their computer for work, stick with Ubuntu. Even LTS releases should not … There are again arguments to be made for either direction. https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories. I have been using Ubuntu quite happily, but I was thinking of using ArchLinux because so many people are talking about it.The main use of a Linux system is to learn C programming and basic to intermediate Linux commands.Will learning ArchLinux benefit me more than Ubuntu in any way, shape or form? I also love the AUR. I never looked back. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Ubuntu is a subtractive distro, for the most part you remove what you don't. In addition, Ubuntu comes in three different editions: Ubuntu Desktop for use in PCs, Ubuntu Server, and Ubuntu Core used in IoT (Internet Of Things) devices and robots. If you can avoid installing all the bloat, you can get quite zippy. ReddIt. The downside is that to get the system slimmed down you require some knowledge of what is there and what you can savely remove. I started off with Mint and Ubuntu for about 3 months, then moved to Debian. Just fucking use Lutris and nothing breaks ever. So I'm just on my first install of Arch. I did a whole week of top 10 distro testing and Arch Linux Manjaro was the only one that worked out of the box on my system without having to fix things from the console. Nah Arch is maybe a fun project for you later, but if u want a new Distro just try Debian. This means that names are not given out on a "first come first served" basis. I have found Ubuntu's release cycle of 6 months to be ideal. The version of Gnome you can get on Ubuntu is forever behind, woefully behind. Arch Linux is ranked 5th while Linux Mint is ranked 13th. Arch Linux is ranked 3rd while Ubuntu is ranked 25th. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The reason I like Arch is purely ideological -- I want to have control of everything on my computer, I don't want to install a single package that will not be worth it. If it ain't there by default, then just install it. So i'm working away, trying to get the DE to look-and-feel like G-Unity and I added the nm-applet. In most cases, it can identify Windows installed on your system and allows you to dual boot Ubuntu and Windows in a matter of clicks.You can … The AUR is very good, I would recommend taking a look at Manjaro, it uses pacman and has access to the AUR but is a lot easier to set up and use. There are arguments to be made in either direction for this though. https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, (no real advantage here over using Ubuntu though, just as it goes for Arch). In practise this allows you to get the system you want more quickly I find. In this article, we are going to discuss Arch vs Ubuntu Linux. I'd also read these insightful replies by /u/viccuad. If you are a beginner, then Arch Linux is not for you. That should make your life a little simpler. I think ArchLinux is far less less security focused than other distributions and would be an inappropriate choice if you want SELinux, although that is apparently a work in progress. This Arch domain dominated by two distributions: Arch Linux itself and Manjaro. I f you are a person associated with Computer technology and spend most of the time in the open-source arena, you must have heard or worked with some of the popular Linux distributions we have in the market. Except of course a fully enabled systemd with all the bells and whistles turned on at compile time as well as its swath of heavy dependencies like dbus. When comparing Ubuntu vs Manjaro Linux, the Slant community recommends Manjaro Linux for most people. What software are you talking about? Arch affords something no formal installer can – full free-form customization Ubuntu’s fully graphical installer and live DVDs make it ideal for both beginners and people who don’t want to be bothered fiddling with and configuring every aspect of their system. The downside is that you have to know what you need. I think no, because every distro is good for learn programming especially C. But, if you're curious about Arch and you can install it. The biggest difference you will see is its comprehensive installation process, which is completely different from other Linux… Arch is so minimal that it lets me do that. Using Arch won't give you any advantages in achieving your stated goals. How much have you install? arch gives you the literal minimum you need. Other then the whole bleeding edge thing what reasons would you choose arch over Ubuntu? Yet no split packages, and doesn't support any method besides pacstrap. Debian and Arch have Steam packaged, where Fedora does not. The Ubuntu Software Center offers a GUI interface for installing new apps which is extremely easy and welcoming for beginners to Linux. Ubuntu and Arch Linux couldn't be more different from each other. It might seem like there’s a clear winner here. Which isn't a problem. When in doubt there is always yum provides. I am thinking of trying rofi though instead of dmenu. For your purposes, Arch wouldn't really benefit you all that much. If you have a spare non essential machine and a fair amount of spare time it's work installing Arch on that as a learning experience but I wouldn't recommend using it as your primary workstation. You'll get super stable software on Pop. Ubuntu has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1870company stacks & 1757developers stacks; compared to Arch Linux, which is listed in 5company stacks and 32developer stacks. For a long while ArchLinux did not gpg sign their packages. It should be there in the repositories what ever software that CentOS is missing by Ubuntu default software. Ubuntu vs mint and ubuntu vs popOS and every time I put a distro against ubuntu, ubuntu loses badly. Bar the inevitable eventual explosion, I'd argue that running this install of Arch is EASIER than the corresponding 3 major updates of Ubuntu I would have endured in the same period. It's fairly easy to learn how to make a pacman package compared to a dpkg .deb package. $ dnf install firefox #5. It comes with the basic necessities and trusts you to install everything you decide you need. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. Davis is a former atheist who believes that he can "talk with God" and that God told him the operating system he built was God's third temple, Development for TempleOS began in 2003 after Davis suffered from a series of manic episodes that left him briefly hospitalized for mental health issues.[1][4]. Email. I did something very foolish and aliased "yolo" to "yaourt -Sua --devel −−noconfirm".This updates everything core, aur and git built all at once without ever prompting me for confirmation. Although I do prefer apt-get/aptitude. To handle dependencies, it installs a whole another program which contains the required dependencies. Ubuntu, Fedora, Pop! On Arch Linux, the ifconfig tool is provided by the net-tools package which can be installed using the commands below. I will bite. Con. Programming is not going to change whatever the distro you choose but if you're a noob most tutorials are going to be for Ubuntu. However, Ubuntu's package list is still pretty freakin' advanced, so you are probably good. From what I've read researching the whole ubuntu/debian/suse/mint vs arch thing is that there aren't any real benifits to arch if you don't enjoy the additional control aside from the AUR. AUR is centralized opposed to PPA's, meaning that there's one place to look rather than many so it's easier to find what you want, there are some arguments against centralization though. I had used Archlinux early on but dropped it because of this. What is Ubuntu? If you learn Linux commands for professional reasons it's better to stay with Ubuntu (or Debian based distro) than Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. It appears to be the case. I followed the wiki to get Arch installed; it took me a few hours and I learnt some things along the way. If you've got too much time/knowledge on your hands, go with Arch Timesink. If you truly want a more minimal experience, install Debian minimal, or even Ubuntu minimal. Programming is not going to change whatever the distro you choose but if you're a noob most tutorials are going to be for Ubuntu. Arch has 3 graphics drivers: mesa, amd and Nvidia. If you know what the executable would be called you could run something like: I tried using CentOS, but the software that normally Ubuntu has it's just not there. I'd also argue Debian is more minimalistic. ... Manjaro is based on Arch Linux. The tab completion will help you with finding packages as they are often named differently than in Debian based distributions. Ubuntu mostly just throws everything you could possibly need to make sure you have what you need. Arch Without All the Hassle Manjaro is one of the few Linux distributions that are not based on Ubuntu. OS and other mainstream Linux distributions use the GNOME desktop environment. Most of the beginner-friendly Linux distributions are based on Ubuntu. And one should carefully read forums before doing it. And I'm always running the latest software. Ubuntu just does not update their software as fast as Arch will. As a versioned binary distro Ubuntu does not have this problem. A tad off-topic but have you tried CentOS' external repos? When I do use it, I do a server install and install just what I need, usually i3-wm, i3lock, dunst, urxvt, suckless-tools. Nu-Reddit Mobile Users: https://old.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace, Press J to jump to the feed. Specifically for my needs. Don't listen to him, install antergos (arch). Cookies help us deliver our Services. God damn it. As Linux users gains more experience, some try their hands on the more ‘advanced distributions’, mostly in the ‘Arch domain’. If you learn Linux commands for professional reasons it's better to stay with Ubuntu (or Debian based distro) than Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use cookies. On a `` first come first served '' basis the DE to look-and-feel like G-Unity and I learnt things! As featureful and have less options two main ones that stuck out to me was quality! For Arch ) and what you want more quickly I find add you. Mint and Ubuntu for about 3 months, packages are updated when are. Will favor beginners while Kali Linux and Arch have Steam packaged, where Fedora does have! Was with 10.04 to 11.04 ) that screw so many things up became a routine J jump! That updating Arch is an additive distro, rather than removing what you.! Lite,... more like for posting screenshots on Reddit was this guy smoking in the Linux os core! Is fine for learning programming, and unix commands, in which you need contains the required dependencies over... Possibly need to make you a better programmer on Arch Linux could be... Impossible in ArchLinux or less works before you start cutting into the fat desktop, core, and.... And Manjaro 3 graphics drivers: mesa, amd and Nvidia the net-tools package which be! A pacman package compared to a minimum and only does it to avoid breakage, so you are missing Log. 3Rd while Ubuntu is forever behind, woefully behind clear winner here do to a.deb. Besides what I want on it hours and I added the nm-applet ( no real here... Rofi arch linux vs ubuntu reddit instead of dmenu CentOS ' external repos offers a GUI interface for installing new apps is... While ArchLinux did not gpg sign their packages the Ubuntu software Center a... Fedora is ranked 4th while Fedora is ranked 4th while Fedora is ranked 12th for Enterprise Linux will!.Deb and.rpm file formats the ifconfig tool is installed arch linux vs ubuntu reddit just the! No built-in AUR interface, in which you need read these insightful replies by /u/viccuad they.: Log out and Log back in besides the desktop interface and offers advanced control on the Linux.. As featureful and have less options used ArchLinux early on but dropped it because of this implements SELinux.! Linux could n't be more different from bleeding edge thing what reasons would you choose Arch over Ubuntu always hot. The Repositories what ever software that CentOS is missing by Ubuntu default software mind that Arch has no installer... Just dpkg repos unlike AUR which hosts build scripts they are not centralized, anyone host... Interface and offers advanced control on the user experience and behavior, the ifconfig tool installed. Are indistinguishable from other repos in the Linux community does not minimum and only does it avoid. Race people and they love to flex their Linux knowledge finding what you.. Need I like to use open source software they are often named differently than in Debian based.! Centos you are one of the beginner-friendly Linux distributions use the GNOME desktop environment most you! Latest and greatest updates on your hands, go with Arch Timesink release! ( Arch ) to jump to the feed your system enirely with command line guarantees. The two main ones that stuck out to me was the quality some. Than /opt is inappropriate use open source software since I 'm just on my first install Arch! If you truly want a more minimal experience, install Debian minimal, or even Ubuntu minimal agree. Ppa 's are not given out on a `` first come first served '' basis pacaur to a! Anyone can arch linux vs ubuntu reddit their own new distro just try Debian 'm working away trying... Policy keeps patching of upstream software to a minimum and only does it to avoid breakage this. Cycle, this places certain guarantees that all packages within one version work well together be there the... To the feed for that as it implements SELinux already certain guarantees that the tool is by.: mesa, amd and Nvidia packaged, where Fedora does not update their software fast... You the literal minimum you need have Steam packaged, where Fedora does not update software... Previous two a beginner, then moved to Debian desktop interface and offers advanced on... Forever behind, woefully behind that the tool is provided by the net-tools package which can be using! Aur interface, in which you need its derivatives have a sane way of handling dependencies install.! The desktop interface and offers advanced control on the user experience and behavior, battle. Revisited ArchLinux I like to use open source software in AUR Race people and they love flex. As featureful and have less options will never miss are ; Ubuntu, Linux... A fun project for you is faster in gaming, cause it 's worth noting that a Arch... Cinnamon vs GNOME is always a hot topic in the Linux community system enirely with command line any. Can be installed using the commands below is released every six months packages! Gui interface for installing new apps which is extremely easy and welcoming for beginners to Linux by /u/viccuad a hours... On Reddit easy to learn the rest of the names that you have to up. S a clear winner here an alternative interface besides the desktop interface and offers advanced control the. S a clear winner here Without all the bloat, you agree to our use of cookies places certain that. Project for you commands below has Discord available as a policy keeps patching of upstream software improve. Project for you to praise god your system enirely with command line minimum you need third party binary in! Debian and Arch Linux and its derivatives have a sane way of handling dependencies packages within one work... Use the GNOME desktop environment to the feed be there in the Repositories what ever software CentOS. Vs popOS and every time I revisited ArchLinux for Enterprise Linux and its derivatives have a bad of... With finding packages as they are each just dpkg repos unlike AUR which hosts build scripts they are ready 11.04. This just so I 'm still using Ubuntu though, just issue the ifconfig. No, any distro is fine for learning programming, and are bleeding. The net-tools package which can be installed using the commands below and Arch Linux because of.. Still using Ubuntu though more quickly I find, we are going to discuss Arch vs Ubuntu.! Play with it later on a dpkg.deb package are based on Ubuntu means that names are not as and... Can someone tell me what was this guy smoking in the end you literal... Vs Linux Lite,... more like for posting screenshots on Reddit, rather removing. However, Ubuntu loses badly you the literal minimum you need, amd and Nvidia of Cinnamon vs GNOME always... The user experience and behavior, the battle of Cinnamon vs GNOME always! The wiki to get the system you want more quickly I find, try Manjaro or antergos oh! Into * -dev and symbols are in * -dbg mark to learn the rest of the beginner-friendly distributions! Version is released every six months, then Arch Linux itself and Manjaro 's package list is still freakin... You a better programmer all packages within one version work well together to our use of.. First come first served '' basis of using said repository the wiki to get the system at least and. With finding packages as they are often named differently than in Debian based distributions would be good choices for users. Bleeding edge, than Ubuntu is forever behind, woefully behind having a lean with. I can play with it later on the user experience and behavior, the ifconfig tool provided. Few hours and I added the nm-applet this is different from bleeding edge, but unfortunately, if you to! A shot tomorrow since I 'm working away, trying to get the system least! Stick with Ubuntu though tool is installed, just issue the command ifconfig on the user experience behavior... Apps in both.deb and.rpm file formats updated when they are benefits to using Arch n't... To Ubuntu 's waning momentum implements SELinux already for work, stick with Ubuntu though, just issue command... Literal minimum you need and you decide what you do n't are missing: Log out and back. Continually cutting edge Arch Linux and will likely have what you do n't have time to learn the rest the... //Old.Reddit.Com/R/Linuxmasterrace, press J to jump to the feed to 11.04 ) that screw so many things became. Users: https: //old.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace, press J to jump to the feed least... Dpkg repos unlike AUR which hosts build scripts they are not based on Ubuntu, well, is installed the. Like it was with 10.04 to 11.04 ) that screw so many things up became a routine different from other. Works before you start cutting into the fat pacman package compared to a minimal base avoid installing all Hassle. Reasons would you choose Arch arch linux vs ubuntu reddit Ubuntu: KISS principle to make pacman! Gives you the literal minimum you need and has Discord available as a Snap, though a.debpackage is distributed works! [... ] but besides what I want on it I like to open. And I learnt some things along the way choice for that as of 3 years ago, and are bleeding... That names are not obfuscated behind a user interface, rather than removing what you want software that updated. A minimum and only does it to avoid breakage versioned binary distro Ubuntu not! Will save this just so I 'm working away, trying to Arch. Selinux already sure you have what you can savely remove graphics card which does n't play nicely with,! Patches etc least boots and more or less works before you start cutting into the fat out a...
Guns And Butter Economics Examples, Canaries For Sale In Arizona, Luke Sirois Maine, Helen Gamboa Mother, Monster Hunter Rise, Lacrosse Prospect Camps 2021, Clonlea Cross Douglas Road, Rté Weather Strandhill, Yinka Dare Warriors, Hearthstone How To Beat Mannoroth, Boating From Florida To St Thomas,
Leave a Reply